Blog sobre Francisco de Goya. Espacio de amistad que aglutine a todos aquellos amigos de Goya o de lo que representa Goya, a la manera de un club on line.

Author: Real Goya

Goya paint “al fresco” in Zaragoza (by Pepe Cerdá)


Today I had the privilege to climb to the scaffoldings that have been placed to restoration of the dome fresco painted by Goya in the Basilica del Pilar in Zaragoza.
To see that closely the huge figures painted more than two hundred years ago by Don Francisco has caused me conflicting sensations.

On one hand that of committing something improper, obscene. These images were not painted to be seen so closely or with violent lighting of halogen light bulbs used by the restorers. In the same way that it is not advisable to see with a microscopic the mites that live in the eyelash of most beautiful of women. It is a question of scale and distance, like almost all the issues are in the world. Goya never saw his work, and even less while doing it, so lighting. Or what means the same: he did not painted, because he did not see (and those who paint are eyes, no hands) what I have seen today. I imagine him painting numb with cold and tempted, and under twinkling candles or quivering oil lamps light. Psychologically handicapped by the criticisms of his brother-in-law and the Cabildo.

It is very noticeable that he had really wanted to finish it soon, to run away. Note also that was not a specialist decorator in fresco and painted “as he could”, with the bravery of his thirty-six years lived with courage, without anything ahead him. I have not seen as much-publicized “ease” in execution, rather I have seen anger, fury to resolve “one fucking way or the other” something that was falling through. “Ease” is the happy and exact lightness of Rembrandt drawings, but in this case is the opposite: there are fierce rubbings with brooms, like screams, against the damp wall. It is wrong to see these paintings relate to the action painting of American abstract expressionism or just the expressionism, or the Picassianan blur, or any way of painting that can be related to, although this has been imposed hundreds of years after he painted the dome. This makes him to be presented like a visionary able to stay ahead of his time, which really like historians, but thinking this seems nonsense to me that do not explain the question at all. What he wanted was to succeed, and for this had to paint like Velázquez and the frescoes coming out like those done by Tiepolo, but he had neither one thing nor the other.


Another thing that is noticeable is that sketches he must keep to are not exactly of him. I mean: his brother-in-law Bayeu was the director of the decoration of the Basilica and is not rare to think that he imposed, not only iconography, but the “way” of matter the issue pictorially. I even tend to think lovey-dovey sketches by Goya that are conserved in the sacristy of the temple seem to be too close to the ones of Bayeu which are exposed by its side, and is not unreasonable that Bayeu himself corrected some defects in his sloppy brother-in-law, for the good of the work. But I have a very bad thinking. However this would explain the “bad attitude”, brilliant but “without interest”, which is extended and translated to mural painting.

He does not use graffito to pass the drawings to the wall, as used to be common, but the drawing is traced with the help of a punch that when applying over the drawing scratches the wall still unset. There are not even half of the calculated figures in this way suggesting that most were undertaken directly without prior drawing. That he traced only the main ones, to get an idea of the scale and then he interspersed the remaining. He did the work in forty days, what means, he painted “the fresco way” only forty days, between December 1780 and March 1781, which is the time the work was done, although “repainted” in “dry” (something not very orthodox in that time) many of the figures. The time he used in making of the work is extraordinarily short for a work of this nature, which allows us to assume a physical and psychic condition beyond normal.
He had still many years of life and painting to show what he was capable of, but he did not knew it yet.

Climbing to the walls. 01/02/2008
Pepe Cerdá. Painter

Posted on the blog of Pepe Cerdá and expressly authorized by the artist to be included in this www.realgoya.com

Goya and Grandville. Dreams

The visions and dreams of Goya are a sign of freedom and rebellion in stripe border of creation, subjectivity and Modernity. Goya has with him the only company of the mind and its functions, what means memory, thinking, feelings, imagination and emotions. This is not a few to achieve results that are, in the end, a show off cosmic imagination and fluidity that pour or sprout illuminated and transparent images of someone who expresses interest in the unconscious fairly before than Grandville, for example.

Si sabrá más el discípulo?
Capricho núm. 37 • Aguafuerte, aguatinta y buril • 218 x 153 mm

And who was Grandville? And what was his interest in the unconscious? The name “Grandville” was his grandparents professional stage name.  Draftsman, watercolorist, caricaturist and lithographer, Jean-Ignace Isidore (Gérard) GRANDVILLE was born on September 15th 1803 in Nancy (France) to an artistic and theatrical family, and died in the asylum of alienated in Vanves (France) on March 17th 1847, at age 43, possibly due to a throat infection.

Related to the genius of Goya, he would be known for their fantastic drawings and satirical cartoons created during the reign of Louis Philippe. Became known in Paris, very young, with the publication of the “Métamorphoses du jour” (Metamorphosis of Today) in 1829. It’s a collection of seventy lithographs of hybrids between humans and animals. In this regard, remember here that the precursor Goya had engraved year’s earlier similar fantasies.


The following year, 1830, Louis Philippe becomes King of France and during the following five years Grandville publish very critical cartoons about the King, by his betrayal to liberals ideal. From November 4th 1830 comes out the magazine “La Caricature”, which under the direction of Charles Philippon, delivers 251 issues up to its latest one on August 27th 1835. Grandville was one of the great illustrators of the magazine and Philippon himself, a large server of current affairs, would entrust him the magazine poster.


Censorship from 1835 will lead Grandville to illustrate books such as editions of “Fables of Lafontaine”, “Gulliver’s Travel” by Jonathan Swift, and the “Robinson Crusoe” by Daniel Defoe.

With great success both critical and audience, between 1840 and 1842 performs his series on “The animals”, with subtitles, which mocks about society and the Government. Though the designs of Grandville are occasionally unnatural and absurd, they usually display keen analysis of character and marvellous inventive ingenuity, and his humour is always tempered and refined by delicacy of sentiment and a vein of sober thoughtfulness.  These drawings are remarkable for the extraordinary skill with which human characteristics are represented in animal facial features

However most of young artists, especially the surrealists, found a greater inspiration in the strange Grandville of “Un Autre Monde” (Another World) (1844), a collection of anamorphic drawing full of fantasy in which reverses the relationship between text and illustration. Also in 220 pictures of “Les Metamophoses du Jour” and “Les Fleurs animees” (Animated Flowers) (1847), his dull imagination announces truly precursor signs of contemporary surrealist invention, while Baudelaire called Grandville a “sickeningly literary spirit”.

The first article of Baudelaire on physical states under the influence of hashish, entitled “Du vin et du hashish” (Wine and Hashish), appeared in 1851, but his experiences with opiates and hashish had begun circa 1843, four years before the death of Grandville. Reflection of an era in full mutation, during which the progress of science and industry disrupted livelihoods and the way to represent the world, to Philippe Kaenel “sleep is a hypothesis, because we never know it more than by its memory, but this memory is necessarily a fabrication, an artifice.”

Dr. Moreau de Tours, who Baudelaire regularly visited, concluded that the dream had similarities to delirium and hallucination, and that these three phenomena had been able to relate conscious and unconscious world. Another doctor, Dr. Brière de Boismont, trying to elucidate the functioning of the brain and also wrote about the nightmares and dreams, not only about the hallucinations. His treatise is abundant in cases of singular dreams, among which some had visual similarities with the illustrations by Grandville.

The artistic and literary interests by the unconscious were demonstrating at the same time. In arts, the first example of this new objectivity applied to the study of dreams and the unconscious is seen in the illustrations of Grandville, better known in the years 1830 and 1840 as a cartoonist who was considered to be at the same height as Monnier, Daumier and Gavarni. Very early in his career gave proof of interest in dreams.


Füssli, Goya and Ingres showed the dreamer and the dream vision, the physical presence of the dreamer, as well as his dream. However Grandville breaks with this kind of images and so much in “Un autre Monde” as in “Metamosphose du Sommeil” (Metamorphosis of Dream) do not see more than the same dream, as if we were witnesses of the clinical fact in a succession of randomly associated shapes.

In 1847, year of his death, Grandville published two complex illustrations of the dream in “Le Magasin Pittoresque”. The first, “Crimen et expiation” (Crime and Expiation), tells about the guilt complex. The second, entitled “Promenade dans le ciel” (Ride in the Sky) is less simple to explain, according to the artist himself. Very little is known with regard to these images, and is ignored if the artist dreamed it himself or only built in his imagination.

In a passage located as an appendix to the second dream, Grandville considers the possibility of every day events, or even the blood circulation, affecting to sleep. In this sense, Baudelaire comments on Grandville give to understand that it was in a great propensity for analytical illustrations: “Before he died, applied his will, always stubborn, to record in a plastic form the succession of dreams and nightmares, with the precision of a set designer who writes the speech of a speaker”. The artist Grandville wanted, indeed, the pencil to explain the law of association of ideas…” (Charles Baudelaire in his complete works).

Grandville’s closest friends remembered that in the months preceding his madness and death, in 1847, he had forebodings of his death, dreamt of strange appearances and suffered from hallucinations.

Due to his scientific predilections, we can see on his artwork, not a few, signs of deep familiarity with the investigations of medicine. For example, in the edition in 1838 of the “Voyages of Gulliver” (Gulliver’s Travel), represents an exchange of brains, giving a prelude of a transfer of personality between the two receivers; He thus showed his knowledge of the brain dissections, practiced by the phrenologists. “Le Cauchemar” (The Nightmare) of Grandville is also a proof of his knowledge of the ways dreams lead to feelings of fear or terror: in his dream relives the daytime experiences and shows some common dreams, as the fall on a stairway.

Finally, Grandville illustrations allow measuring both knowledge as the writers on the unconscious in the years 1830 and 1840. Before Courbet show his interest, as later did it at the time that was in Paris with Baudelaire, Grandville was the most curious of this type of reinvestigation artist. But he remained as an illustrator, while working in an environment where to enter such scientific issues. Also Courbet will favor later the appearance of this theme, which will be a key component of the realistic material, into the mainstream of painting. With what the same Courbet seems to point in the direction of the art of Gauguin, Munch, Redon and the Picasso blue and pink, in which the sleepy figures illustrations or going into a trance of dream, the oniric imagination, come to constitute a bigger theme of avant-garde painting general trend.

GdD

Goya and Callot

Jacques Callot, was born in 1592 in Nancy, France, and died in the same city on 24th or 25th of March 1635, is one of the great engravers of the history but today is virtually unknown to the general public. His contributions as much in technics than in subjets, were more than remarkable and so he is considered nowdays, having influence over the engraving evolution and the conception of the topics to deal with, and at the same time with his very personal way of focusing on all the matters.

Callot is one of the most important etchers of all time, and it is known that he produced more than 1500 prints. Very young, at age 12 and led by an irresistible ambition to become a great artist, he moved to Rome and Florence, the city where he made a long series of etchings that it supposes the true representation of the Commedia dell’arte . With a very personal revolutionary technique and aesthetics, he depicts  life scenes with honesty and accuracy. He creates school “in the style of Callot” and joings the short list of the greatest engravers in the History of Art.
[/one_half_last]

Grandes Miserias de la Guerra.
Juego completo de 18 aguafuertes 
Todos: 80 x 185 mm.

 

 

In 1614 he took in to service of Cosimo II’s de Medici and he creates, among others, their Caprici di varie gigantic figure and Impunetta della Fair, one of the masterpieces of engraving. He makes everything and has enormous succes at all levels.

In 1621, after Cosimo II’s  death, he returned to Nancy, capital of the Duchy of Lorraine, where in 1637 he made his masterpiece, The Miseries and Misfortunes of War , inspired at least in part in the extermination of the people, desolation and ruin after the invasion of Lorraine ordered by Richelieu. This is a terrible representation of the atrocities carried out during the Thirty Years War, perfectly comparable in quality with the Disasters of War by Goya, whom certainly inspire both the Caprichos, as  the Disasters of War already mentioned.

Grabado número 11 de la serie de 18, titulado The hanging (El ahorcamiento)

The end of his career will be very fruitful equally remarkable, highlighting its famous Temptation of St. Anthony made shortly before his death in March 1635.

 

Detalle de “El ahorcamiento” de Jacques Callot, 1633.

 

 

Moreover Jacques Callot was indeed the first artist in the history of art, that instead of glorifying the courage, the force, the heroic death and the war, prefers to express the horror and the war misery and it will have to wait two centuries until Goya re-took the war as a subjet, under the same point of view, considering  the poor and disinherited as the genuine heroes of the history.

We show, with an illustration, one of the scenes of his The Miseries and Misfortunes of War (*), the engraver number 11 and a detail of the sameone, in which we can notice similariries worth to be mentioned in the Goya’s disaster nomber 14  Duro es el paso (Hard is the way!) in which Goya, like Callot, represents very pathetic the simultaneity of the death and the figure of a priest, who tries to comfort spiritually  one of the condemned.

GdD

 

14. Duro es el paso!
Francisco de Goya, circa 1810-1815. Aguafuerte, aguada bruñida, punta seca y buril. 143 x 168 mm.

Page 17 of 17

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

RealGoya