RealGoya

Blog sobre Francisco de Goya. Espacio de amistad que aglutine a todos aquellos amigos de Goya o de lo que representa Goya, a la manera de un club on line.

Places where Goya lived. Zaragoza I

In my opinion there is a very interesting question when we get closer to the work of an artist so known as Goya: the reconstruction of historic environments in which had emerged the works of his hand, today exposed in the major international museums. But bringing this issue to the birthplace of the painter, we can perhaps understand better his composition of place or the way of facing life and future events; his learning and the first external contributions that will influence him, more or less, onwards. And this issue is also interesting as a component of tourism in the birthplace of this kind of universal artists.

Fachada

It will be worth it in the case which concerns us here, no doubt to Zaragoza or Madrid also, or the same Bordeaux. The reason why in this blog, dedicated to Goya, intends to, as an essential aim, transmit and make understandable to society the figure of Goya, as well as the influence of his work and personality in the Spain of the late Eighteenth and early Nineteenth century. As well as the significance and influence outside Spain and finally in the whole world.

If today, in June 2013, the word “Goya” in Google is mentioned approximately in forty and five million inserts on the Internet, this means that the interest in Goya in the world is certainly very high. And thus it will always be much better know the origin of the artist, his native land, customs and way of life.

quevalor

That courage! Etching, aquatint, drypoint and Burin burnisher. 158 x 209 mm.

And to begin with, our interest to show the general and artistic atmosphere of a city like Zaragoza, where Goya was born and lived until his departure to Madrid for the first time at age 17 and later alternating with Zaragoza between 1766-69, to emigrate permanently to Madrid “called by Mengs” as himself said, at the age of 29; i.e., how it was the city and its environment and above all how it looked like when the young painter came and went through the streets, monuments and institutions of his time. What still remains of that in a city, Zaragoza, which suffered so in the Spanish Independence War and, more particularly, in the terrible siege by the army of Napoleon Bonaparte in 1808 and 1809. City that would eventually be tragically destroyed by the neglect of their leaders and the devastating effects of a rampant and ignorant, ‘developmentalism’ that respected neither the reality of the historical heritage, nor give opposition with energy to disastrous property speculation in the second half of the 20th century.

Patio

Retablo

In the school of Escuelas Pías, Francisco de Goya received his first teaching, sharing studies, games and amusement with what would be his best friend, Martín Zapater. The original structure of the building are preserved today an inner courtyard, a part of the cloister, the church and its façade, as well as the part of the facade of the school that follows the original line and is the attached to the entrance of the church.  This was built in brick with socket stone under the protection of the Archbishop Castro Agüero, in 1736. The interior is baroque and composite order. In shape of a cross and a single nave, the altarpiece is giltwood, mid-18th century, and is dedicated to Saint Thomas Aquinas, as a tribute to the figure of this Doctor of Church, patron of all universities and Catholic schools throughout the world.

Sn. José de C.

In the spirit of “Glory and Honor to Calasanz” in addition to that correct altarpiece, is clearly remarkable another lateral altarpiece dedicated to Saint Joseph Calasanz, with painting of the second half of the 18th, possibly by Ramon Bayeu, according to what says Professor Abbad Rios, and not collected by Morales Marín in his catalog, nor so does Anson. In another altar there is also a canvas dedicated to Saint Roque, Luzán’s former Aragonese school, who would be the first teacher of Goya.

Beyond his paternal home and the closest streets, in a small town as the Zaragoza of that time, certainly this was a first and interesting impression Goya lived on a daily basis in his childhood at the Piarist College and which is, among others, a-must-visit for the tourist who wants to follow the first ‘Zaragozanian’ experiences of Francisco de Goya.

Gonzalo de Diego

Goya’s “El Coloso”

Last April 2013 has been “busy” in the Spanish media in relation to Goya and its timeliness.

Perhaps the most remarkable news is the referred to the study presented by the historian Carlos Foradada Baldellou, Professor of the University of Zaragoza, in which strongly affirms that authorship by Goya’s “El Coloso” should not be discussed nor be declassified by Prado Museum’s conservator Manuela Mena. The declassification, made with the endorsement of the director of the Museum, Miguel Zugaza, took place in June 2008.

Professor Foradada already made a very interesting contribution in 2010 with his study of the original contents of the “Black Paintings” by Goya in the photographs of Laurent. “The conclusions of a long process”. Published in Madrid, GOYA Art Magazine, nr. 333. October-December 2010. Pp. 320-339.

01coloso

El Coloso. 1808-12  Oleo/lienzo. 116 x 105 cm. Madrid, Museo del Prado

Therefore, Foradada, who has just published his last work in the scientific journal of the Aragonese Association of Art Critics, AACA, focuses on technical issues of the study and development of fine arts, and not exclusively in historiography type arguments like used by Mena in his time to award “El Coloso” to the hand of painter Asensio Juliá.

That unexpected declassify was reported adversely by the recently deceased Nigel Glendinning, possibly then the most serious and respected specialist in Goya, who the 1st July 2008 expressed his flatly contrary opinion, and said forcefully that «what is happening is serious and sad, the Prado Museum admits things without sufficient study»

For anyone who has a curiosity for the study of arts in general, and drawing and painting in particular, will not result too strange the conscientious, very precise and full of seriousness and smartness way the great British specialists, such as Glendinning, put in their admirable research work.  These rigorous work methods try, usually with success, to meet exactly all the positive and negative aspects of each question, assaying up the details and most trivial strokes. So well, this comprehensive way of working is also that regularly used by the most prestigious cultural institutions in the world, in countries such as the United States, Germany, France, Italy or Poland, to name a few, among them, in good law, is Spain. Reason why is painfully remarkable the improvised way the Prado Museum concluded its declassification in 2008, and completed it with a ruling by January 2009 in which stated that the picture is from a indeterminate disciple of Goya, not even being able to ensure that was Juliá.

In his latest work, Foradada places the painting in its historical context and point out the influences of war events of the moment on his way to see the painting. It also confronts the picture with the known equestrian portrait of general Palafox, as well as emphasizes the painting technique used by Goya at that time. Free from prejudice of low value, and aside from subjective personal tastes more or less decisive, it systematizes and argues its study by denying the declassifying of “El Coloso” and ensuring that the Prado Museum “will have to rectify sooner or later”.

With similar arguments, Foradada reasonably refers to the declassification by Mena of both the portrait of Marianito Goya and “La lechera de Burdeos” (“The milkmaid of Bordeaux”).

 

02metropolitan

Don Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuñiga (detalle) Oleo / lienzo. 127 x 101,6 cm. Nueva York, Metropolitan Museum. The Jules Bache Collection, 1949 (49.7.41)

 

An interesting controversy then, adding new arguments to the ones made by most of the experts in the work of Goya, and pop up impressions that imply very different ways to classify the great masters of the universal History of Art.  Because one thing is that Rembrandt Research re-classified all the paintings of the master of chiaroscuro, affecting the Museum or any collection that would affect, and that the affected Museum give or fails to give explanations such as “they were not painted by Rembrandt, but are from that time”. Or the reasoned, rigorous and necessary new classification of their Goyas done by the Metropolitan Museum of New York, directed by Philippe de Montebello in September 1995.  That decision was, openly, trying to avoid disputes in regard with the authenticity and the best or worst attribution of certain works long considered as from the hand of Goya. But another quite different is what in Spain seems a sudden and subjective mistake of the Prado, in the confused and poorly adjusted operation of 2008 which continues revealing today, as did then, as hasty as useless.

Gonzalo de Diego

Hecuba and the nightmare of Füssli

Hecuba is the second wife of Priam. His genealogy was the subject of controversy in Antiquity because, famous because of her fertility, it is said that she gave to Priam nineteen children; Euripides speaks of fifty. Apollodorus, however, says fourteen: Hector is the firstborn; Paris, surnamed Alejandro, the second, whose birth was preceded by a prophetic dream. A dream we are interested now especially.

Shortly before giving birth to her second child, had a strange dream: saw out of her bosom a torch, which set fire to the city of Troy, and even the forests of Ida. Consulted the soothsayers, they stated that the child who would be born would be cause of the ruin of the city.

The legend of the dream of Hecuba back to her the origins of crime which meant the downfall of Troy, because of being mother of Paris as for having refused to kill this one, against the opinion of the gods.

AII78914

El sueño de  Hécuba. Giulio Romano

Giulio Romano, distinguished disciple of Raphael and who Vasari spots as his most brilliant collaborator, had to enter his workshop being still a boy. He soon worked according to the designs of the master and collaborated in the stanze of the Vatican.

Giulio Romano will illustrate the dream of Hecuba in one of his most famous paintings of the Palazzo Ducale in Mantua (Italy), the city of Gonzaga. This topic will spur the imagination of Füssli inspiring him in his famous “Nightmare”.

F 2 El sueño Dublin ogoya827

El Sueño (detalle). Francisco de Goya. Oleo / lienzo. 46,5 x 76 cm. National Gallery Dublin. Irlanda.

In my book “Goya’s border” (see on this website) I affirm that there are authors who suggest that Goya knew The Nightmare of Füssli, exposed for the first time in 1782 and widely diffused then in form of engravings. And also Füssli, like Goya, show the dreamer and the dream vision, this means, both the physical presence of the dreamer as also his dream.

In this regard, the question is who was Füssli and how his “Nightmare”. As well, Johann Heinrich Füssli, (Zurich, February 7, 1741 – Putney Hill, London, April 16, 1825) was an excellent draughtsman, painter, historian of art and Swiss writer, later established in Britain, where is known as Henry Fuseli.

F 3 John_Henry_Fuseli_-_The_Nightmare 1ª

La pesadilla (The Nightmare) o El íncubo. Johann Heinrich Füssli, 1781. Oleo / lienzo.  101 x 127 cm. Detroit Institute of Arts, Detroit, USA

A woman asleep, owned by an Incubus (demon that occurs in dreams of erotic kind) is referred to by the head of a horse’s ghostly appearance. It is one of the most emblematic works of Füssli, specialized in issues related to loneliness, fear, satanism, eroticism and horror, which will inspire the satanic imagery of the 19th century. Its title in German, Nachtmahr, was the name of the horse of Mephistopheles.

Thematically Füssli is a representative closest to German romanticism, since their night and terrifying world is parallel to the dark romance of a Novalis or a Hoffmann. What makes him an important figure when to study the transition between neo-classicism and romanticism, and be able to consider him pioneered in the exploration of the irrational, a fact why with reason has been compared with Goya. Although shortly after his death fell in a relative oblivion, however would be later vindicated by the expressionists and surrealists, who saw it as a predecessor for his poetic of sublime, his allusion to the dream and its nightmare erotica.

Füssli made this work inspired by the Dream of Hecuba of Giulio Romano, although there are who assumed that he would inspire in the Dream of Raphael , by Marcantonio Raimondi.

F 4 Marcantonio_Raimondi_-_The_Dream_of_Raphael_-_WGA18975

El Sueño de Rafael. Marcantonio Raimondi (1474 – 1534). Primera mitad del siglo XVI. Grabado  230 mm x 330 mm. British Museum

Füssli performed at least two versions on the subject of the Nightmare, the most famous being that of 1781, today at the Detroit Institute of Arts; another, 1790-91, is located in the Goethes Elternhaus in Frankfurt am Main.

Anyway, this representation so characteristic of black romanticism keeps its model trying to sow doubt, give body to the unthinkable and requires the loss of control of the reason and the triumph of the imagination. The movement is well represented by works of artists such as Goya, Friedrich, Füssli, Delacroix, Redon, Munch, Ernst and also Salvador Dalí.

Gonzalo de Diego

Page 15 of 17

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

RealGoya